By Libby George
LONDON (Reuters) – Brazil’s central bank Governor Roberto Campos Neto said on Friday that the bank’s independence is crucial for the country’s economy and lending growth, as political pressure mounted for it to reduce borrowing costs.
President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and other politicians have pressured the bank to lower benchmark interest rates, which stand at a six-year high of 13.75%. But Neto, speaking at the Lide Brazil Conference in London, defended the bank’s actions.
“What we do is for technical reasons, not political reasons,” Campos Neto said, adding that lowering interest rates “only works on credit if there is credibility.”
“In the past we cut interest rates and instead of raising credit, it fell, because there was no credibility to make that move,” he said.
Campos Neto also said he doesn’t think that inflation is being driven by supply constraints, defending high interest rates and the technical targets the bank is using to determine its actions.
Brazil has an inflation target of 3.25% for 2023, which will be lowered to 3% in 2024, but consumer prices reached 4.65% in the 12 months through March.
Campos Neto said that the Brazilian central bank made the biggest interest rate hike in world history during an election period, which “shows that the central bank is quite independent.”
“We were very independent during the (presidential) election process. If we hadn’t increased interest rates during the elections, inflation would be higher,” Campos Neto said during the Lide Brazil Conference in London.
Shortly before Campos Neto spoke in the London conference, Senate leader Rodrigo Pacheco openly criticized high interest rates during the same event, arguing that high rates were hurting growth.
“I am sure that the central bank will be very much capable to reduce interest rates”, Pacheco said.
Lula earlier this month hinted at a potential target change, calling high lending costs in the country “inexplicable” as he continued his push for lower interest rates.
“Central bank timing is technical and is different from political timing. The cost of fighting inflation is high, but the cost of not fighting inflation is much higher.”
(Reporting by Libby George, editing by Jorgelina do Rosario; Editing by Kim Coghill)
